• Tuesday, April 27th, 2004
Nebbiolo sent me a link to a chick tract that I’d heard of (back when I was into Chick Tracts) but was never able to see. Apparently they reprinted it (and probably changed it… many of the late 60s/70s/early 80s tracts got a rewrite before being re-released. Like the one targetting the African-American population in prison. Seriously. But I digress.).
Er… where was I?
Oh, right, the Chick tract. okay. lets start at the beginning. For those of you who don’t know what a tract is, it’s a little pamphlet or page long handout, that gives political or religious information. You don’t see the political usage all that much these days, which is sort of apt, as the word tract can also refer to scripture. So, typically, it’s a little pamphlet that talks about why you should repent and join the ranks of the christian community. They tend to be a standard page overfilled with little tiny text, and occasional bits of scripture. I generally find them dull.
Now, Chick. Jack Chick is a wannabe cartoonist who came up with the idea of drawing little cartoons with Christian messages. So chick tracts refer to the little comic book tracts he makes that are designed to convert you to Jesus.
His website‘s motto is “Chick Tracts get read.” Which is true. He has a cult following of non-christians who like his tracts because they’re so over the top and insane. This is not because they’re christian. This is because he draws these things without doing any apparent research, combined with the fact that he’s a bible literalist. I’m not sure if his sanity has changed over the years; in some respects he’s become a much more stringent bible literalist over the years, yet many of his tracts have been toned down over the decades. I attribute the latter occurance to the enlargement of his tract operation. Read: Some where along the way, he got handlers who veto some of the truly inappropriate stuff.
It’s the literalist bible routine that gets to me most I think. It’s alternately baffling and absurd. An example from his latest publication (in which Ms. Henn the substitute teacher attempts to teach the children evolution): “God tells us in the Bible what happened… and He should know… He was there! Was Ms. Henn?” -Apes, Lies and Ms. Henn Though he’s willing to interpret for us too: in his version of the bible “God said He made the first dinosaur and the first man on the same day!” If it weren’t such a scary idea, I think it would be fun to re-create the bible based on Chick’s interpretation. I suspect it’d be rather different than the original…
Oddly enough, this tract actually answered a question that has long plagued me about the whole evolution/creationism debate: Why is the idea of presenting evolution so inherently evil? Chick in particular is a vocal opponent of any opinion other than his own in his tracts, which just seems so brain dead to me. But he actually gives a rational explanation for a change! “The saddest part is… if people are told that we come from apes… and believe it… Then they won’t pay any attention to what God says.” In other words, people capable of thinking for themselves won’t choose to listen to what the bible says?
Er…
Anyway, back to the whole point of this post (yes, I did forget about the point for an hour or so. But the research was a lot of fun.). Nebbiolo sent me a link to a Chick tract I’d always wanted to get my hands on: the one that explains why D&D is evil
For all my gaming buddies:
Dark Dungeons
And, of course, while doing all my research, I found a parody of Dark Dungeons explaining why being Goth just blows, so for all my lapsed Goth friends:
Darque Dungeon
I also found a tract for the rest of us:
Why settle for the lesser evil? Cthulhu Chick!